Score: 6

"Lefty?"

submission: Drawing with a Mouse

date: June 11, 2008

maybe you should try using your right hand?

pretty good drawing anyways.

-26

Score: 5

"Interesting..."

submission: Neon Bubble

date: May 27, 2008

dont really like mouse over games, i prefer clicking.

you should have called this "glass sphere shatter." it doesnt really look like a bubble popping. there was a bunch you could have done with the popping graphics and sounds.

pretty fun game all in all though.

-26

Score: 7

"Sometimes the best games are the simplest..."

submission: Floz

date: May 27, 2008

if the graphics had been better i would have rated it higher. excellent concept and game design. i like the concept of getting new characters.

couple things to improve-

graphics- enough said
sounds- enough said
character selection- maybe make a character at the beginning that you stick with, but that you can vary as you gain more exp. for example, you could choose to put 5 pts towards shrinking the x- axis of the character by 1, or incrase his y-axis speed, etc.

keep at it!

-26

Score: 6

"reminds me of an old nintendo game..."

submission: Wild West Coin Fest

date: May 27, 2008

pretty entertaining and fun game.

i noticed a couple of layer issues with the moneybags being behind objects that were in the background.

on a nitpicky note- the money sign changed from a loop style on the money bags to a non-loop font when you shoot the bags. not really sure why you didnt use the same font from one to the other?

all in all, a fun liitle game with a peppy background music loop.

-26

Score: 5

"good tutorial, but..."

submission: How-To: Pixel/Grid

date: May 27, 2008

good tutorial but there was no example of an animation done in this style. cool idea though...

-26

Score: 4

"Same concept, worse execution"

submission: STORAGE

date: May 27, 2008

i rated this a 4 bc this is just like a game that i loved, but done worse. the game was called warehouse will. the key diferences here were that, 1: your game was rendered in 3-d and WW was an overhead view, 2-d (i did not feel that anything was added to the gameplay by doing it in 3d); 2: the metiric of success was in time on this game unlike in WW where it was the number of moves.

i feel that for this type of game, number of moves is much more important. its all about strategy and being as efficient as possible.

if this had been the first of its kind, or even if you had changed the boxes to something else, i would have given you a higher score. as it is, it is just too similar to Warehouse Will and you didnt really improve on it at all.

-26

Score: 10

"That is incredible."

submission: Chronotron

date: May 15, 2008

Incdredible idea, execution, graphics, everything.

-26

Score: 9

"That was incredible..."

submission: Chuck's New Tux!

date: May 14, 2008

Is it wrong to actually be satisfied by an ending like that? That guy was REALLY annoying.

great job man.

-26

Score: 5

"Good drawing..."

submission: Saber pounce

date: May 14, 2008

You have some talent, and i really liked the unpolished style...

Good things:
. the drawing
. the ambient sounds of the water

Couple things i would change:
. Come up with a story- give me a reason to watch, keep watching and want to watch future movies by you.
. If you dont come up with a story- you had better be showcasing some REALLY badass art.
. Make more realistic sound effects or add music- when the tiger pounces into the water, the splash doesnt really reflect a realistic sound. and what was that sound when the moths comes into view? i thought it was going to be music, but it was really choppy.

-26

Score: 6

"good colors"

submission: Let's Count!

date: May 12, 2008

you had good colors and i enjoyed watching this animation. nothing too new or amazing about it, but solid.

Thanks for the shoutout too.

-26